All in it together

The following commentary appeared in a recent Rosemont Market email, which might not have been the best place for it to appear. It is now reprinted here, both because this is a better forum for it and because we hope readers will be encouraged to post their own comments in response.

Making enemies

It’s not usually in a business’s best interests to discuss politics publicly, but here it comes anyway. Paul LePage’s eager announcment shortly after becoming Maine’s governor that he will rescind Gov. Baldacci’s prohibition of state agencies to question the immigration status of…anyone they choose…is not just unkind, not just uncivil (and aren’t we trying to be more civil these days?), not just culturally obsolete, not just un-Republican (aren’t Republicans supposed to be the first to defend the privacy of non-criminal individuals?), it’s fiscally foolish and — here’s where Rosemont comes in — offensive to Maine’s agricultural community. 

Who does LePage think does an ever-increasing amount of the farm work in Maine? How are these people to appreciate the full benefits of a citizenship they aspire to if they’re too scared to show up at public events (everything from town council meetings to farmers’ markets) and participate in Maine’s culture? How is our home-grown, built-for-the-21st-century economy to develop and thrive? How are we going to “buy local” and support the state’s start-up businesses when some of the hardest-working, youngest and most creative members of the local economy start looking for a politically friendlier state?

Ask Arizona, to paraphrase Sarah Palin, how their hopeless-strangey thing (draconian interrogation strategies and all the rest) is “workin’ out for ya” — for their tourism industry, for their economy, for their international image and sense of pride.

Or ask Washington County who’s going to pick wild blueberries. Ask increasing numbers of Maine poultry processors, broccoli pickers and fisherfolk just where they’re going to throw their shoulders to the wheel. Ask other Rosemont shoppers how they plan on keeping it close to home.

If you think new Maine inhabitants of African, Asian and Central American origin going cold, hungry or sick this winter, for fear of asking Health and Human Services for some emergency aid, is a necessary trade-off that enables us to direct our scant public monies to U.S. citizens, that’s at least a legitimate argument and we can have a healthy debate (though just so you know, DHHS is already required to ask applicants’ immigration status).

But Maine’s population is aging fast; we need young people to stay here and work! The last thing we should be doing is to tell people who come here to go away. And for all of us who take rightful pride in a flourishing local food community, don’t we want more people in that community — as producers, distributors and consumers — a year, and three, and ten from now? Even if all we are is selfish, don’t we want to eat wild blueberries?

If this strikes a chord with you, please join the march against LePage’s executive order, planned for next Monday, Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, from Portland’s Preble Street Resource Center to City Hall. 1 p.m.
  1. Brian
    January 14, 2011 at 11:35 am | #1

    I’m not going to talk about the policy, but rather its relation to agriculture since that’s how it was framed in the email and then this post.

    Is it the position of Rosemont that Maine agriculture can’t succeed without illegal immigrants being paid a slave wage? That Maine’s 7.4% unemployed aren’t willing to do those jobs? Or that Maine’s economy can’t afford those jobs if the people performing them are paid a fair wage?

    Unless you’re *not* talking about illegal immigrants, and you just mean immigrants in general, in which case they’re not violating any laws and can provide their true immigration status without fear, just as you or I can demonstrate citizenship at a border crossing or airport without giving it much thought. You only have to worry if you know you’re doing something wrong.

    “How are these people to appreciate the full benefits of a citizenship they aspire to if they’re too scared to show up at public events…?” If they’re documented, they they have nothing to fear. If they’re not, then they aren’t on a path to citizenship anyway. False logic.

    It’s interesting to me how so many people either tacitly or directly support illegal immigration instead of advocating for opening up the legal kind. Legal immigration is a wonderful thing that has made this country great. It should be encouraged and expanded. But I’m not in the mood to defend people who break our laws with their very first footsteps on U.S. soil.

    • Kath
      January 14, 2011 at 6:18 pm | #2

      Brian gets it!

    • January 15, 2011 at 9:36 am | #3

      It’s the position of Rosemont that consumers would have to pay many times what they currently do if the workers producing consumer products were paid a fair wage. Our economy — local, food-related, and otherwise — runs to a certain extent on artificially low prices, which are based on artificially low wages. The people in our society willing to work for artificially low wages are often those deemed to be “illegal”.

      Rosemont endeavors to source ALL its products from businesses that pay fair wages. But we have heard, both directly from Maine businesses as well as in media reports available everywhere, that there are indeed plenty of (“legal”) people unwilling to perform certain jobs: the work is too hard, unglamorous and thankless; the pay is too scant. Farming and food production jobs are among the most difficult and thankless out there. As in other industries, the people who step up to perform these jobs are often those we call “illegal”.

  2. Emma
    January 14, 2011 at 11:58 am | #4

    Thank you for articulating this so well. Yes, we want to eat wild blueberries but more importantly, we want to practice human kindness

  3. Kath
    January 14, 2011 at 12:01 pm | #5

    Recently my Maine Driver’s license expired. Dutifully I went to the DMV with checkbook in hand. I was not able to renew as I had no proof of citizenship. I was taken aback as I had held a valid ME DL for almost 30 years. Past history was not good enough, I had to present 2 forms of proof of my legal status or a valid Passport. At first I could understand why someone requesting a new license would be asked but after 30 years…..? Reluctantly I went home to retrieve passport. After I smoothed my ruffled feathers I felt better about the new policy. It is not immigrants that are being targeted but those here illegally. With state and national budgets stretched beyond control, there is only so much money to go around. Why not assure those who are in Maine by legal means receive assistance. Those who made the right connections to emigrate to this country should carry around their documentation with pride.

  4. Susan
    January 14, 2011 at 12:23 pm | #6

    I hope anyone who’s complaining about immigrants of any kind doing the work that this country relies on IS “in the mood” for working to ‘open up’ pathways to legal immigrant status.

    Regarding the issue of immigrants & public benefits:

    http://www.truth-out.org/undocumented-immigrants-pay-more-taxes-than-they-receive-benefits59264

  5. Peter Graf
    January 14, 2011 at 1:28 pm | #7

    how about just continuing to what you do best, namely running 3 grat stores. Stay out of politics and voicing personal opinions. If you must continue then please put your name to it.

    • January 14, 2011 at 1:34 pm | #8

      I see both sides. Many customers have expressed gratitude for a store drawing connections to the wider world. My comments (which I’ve always put a name to, I think pretty clearly: Joe Appel) attempted to show how a “political” issue has ramifications for businesses in general, and our business in particular. (Other comments here, like Brian’s, extend these connections, both pro and con). Others, like you, would appreciate no such connections being drawn — I see the merits in that, just happened to make this choice this time. Thanks.

  6. Jutta
    January 14, 2011 at 1:33 pm | #9

    I agree with you that a “call to arms”[my words] in your newsletter was not the right forum. Neither is a blog under the heading of Rosemont market the answer to inform the public about how you feel. The well written piece would be better placed on the Op-Ed page of a Maine newspaper.

  7. January 14, 2011 at 2:09 pm | #10

    Keep up the good work, Joe….opinions and information are what we all need right now. If I were in Maine, I’d gladly attend (and burn my bra, too!)

    Kate Cone

  8. Molly
    January 14, 2011 at 3:20 pm | #11

    Thank you for moving this dialogue (diatribe?) to a forum better suited for these important conversations.

    I appreciate that Rosemont Market wants to nourish our brains as well as our tummies. I am grateful for the impact the markets and the people associated with them continually play in my own awareness the role food plays in our local and global economy, our politics, our way of life.

    Your blog is designed to engage thinking people in important conversations about ‘everything food’ – from grower to consumer. I look forward to following this conversation here, rather than in the Rosemont Newsletter, which I LOVE reading each week because it’s smart, fun, well-written, informative and delightfully sassy.

  9. Carolyn
    January 14, 2011 at 3:35 pm | #12

    Way to go Joe. If it were up to Mr. LePage, any discussion of immigration would be about people who don’t look like us or talk like us, taking things away “us.” As a purveyor of local foods and a supporter of sustainable, local agriculture, I would hope you would weigh in on political issues that affect your business, just as I’m sure a gun store would weigh in on gun legislation. Thank you for elevating the discussion, I think you got people thinking. As for the Rosemont email, I wouldn’t mind at least a teaser so I know what to expect from your blog updates.

  10. Ron
    January 14, 2011 at 6:08 pm | #13

    I do agree with the Governor. I am all for aliens entering our nation, as our forefathers did. They need to do it legally as our ancesters did. If you are not here legally you should not be able to receive benefits that are set aside for people who are here legally. This country has laws that protect it’s citizens from people breaking those laws. Why should we put criminals in jail and reward illegal aliens.

  11. Nancycalvert
    January 15, 2011 at 11:55 am | #14

    Whether I think like you do or not..This article turned me off cold. finger pointing,name calling,
    She said ,He said. come on,stop this negative talk.its your opinion, keep it or share it with other narrow minded folks,Its never all wrong or all right, We need to heed President Obama’s heart felt words, & not be so quick to judge & blame, Find out why some people feel different then you do, listen,then respectfully offer your opinion in the proper place, Wishing you wider views,And open heart, You can do much good if you can drop the anger and choose a less condemning approach,
    Blessing,

  12. Kathleen Densmore Britos
    January 15, 2011 at 12:11 pm | #16

    John,

    This is why we shop at Rosemont. The Densmore Britos family will be at the MLK walk on Monday! We hope to see many friends and neighbors there.

    Kathy and Cesar

  13. Kevin
    January 16, 2011 at 11:28 am | #17

    I love shopping at your various locations, your staff is always very professional and your produce, meats and bakery items are the best in the area.

    One great thing about the US, is that we can voice our disagreements without fear of persecution, intimidation or being locked up. I completely disagree with your position regarding validating that a person who wants our assistance (free or subsidized house, free medical assistance, food stamps, energy assistance, etc.) should be required to prove they are here legally.

    Maine has one of the highest tax burdens in our nation and has created a climate of entitlement regarding public assistance. If you believe we should be subsidizing those who are here illegally, how much should we be giving and since we have a state deficit what should be cut so we can provide them with assistance or should just raise taxes ?

    The economic engine of Maine, which primarily has been manufacturing based, is crumbling as our high paying jobs are being shipped to low cost producing countries and being replaced by minimum wage positions. Step outside of York and Cumberland counties and you will see the rest of Maine struggling to survive.

    Our National debt is now $14 Trillion, $1 Trillion higher than it was 7 months ago. The amount that every man, woman and child owes is over $45,000 each. At some point, the crisis of the last couple of years will pale in comparison to what’s going to happen when countries like China, Saudi Arabia and others will no longer by our debt.

    I applaud your entrepreneurial vision and work ethic building such a wonderful place for Mainers to shop. It’s time the rest of Maine follows your lead and undertand it about hardwork not entitlements

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.